Should be Amazon developed?
: These pictures indicate a process of destruction of the Amazon forest. The green color means the forest, and the brown color means the developed land. As you can see above, the forest is disappearing more and more, and the developed land is becoming wider and wider. We can see the mass and heartless destruction of the forest.
Honestly, I'm worried about the development of Amazon because I'm sure that the development will cause the environmental disasters like huge earthquake and flood, global warming etc. that are occuring is this time of change. The whole world's human beings are suffered from those disasters, and they lose their families, houses, friends, their possesions etc. Our earth can's stand anymore about our ignorance and violence about the nature, so the earth is even with us for those rudery. To develop Amazon is not just the nation's matter, but it's the serious matter of all over the world.
I know we don't have a right to block the development because the Amazon is not our land, and there are also good impacts of the growth in the nation like the increase of amenities, public facilities etc. Should we just look at the progression vacantly, or is there anything that we can do about this matter?
We know that whole nations in the world need that kind of development, and that's the necessary condition under a civilized state of society. Each nation has a right to develop their own country, but also to preserve the natural environment. No matter what the developed countries say, the developing countries couldn't agree with them because the deloveopled countries've enjoyed the growth until now, but the others couldn't. So it looks unfair to argue the developing countries should preserve the nature above all things.
Speaking for myself, the developed countries should offer enough compensation about the environmental and natural preservation of developing countries because the countries couldn't get the profits due to the growth. The advanced countries should share the profits of the growth with the developing countries. I think it's fair. We need a long-range view, and it's also good for the advanced countries. As perserving the nature, they can save money because they would need more expence to reestablish the strucken nation due to the natural disasters than the cost for the protection of the environment of underdeveloped countries. I think it's a win-win approach to this matter, and the advanced countries should try to gain the trust of developing countires consistently.
Yeah. We need an awareness about the disaster of Amazon. We just live without any conception about other countries. So someone have to tell their stories and damages. It could be a Government, a company, or us.
답글삭제Amazon is the territory of some countries but its development have a strong impact on thw whole world. For Brazil, developing thier resources and making money are important of couse, but they also know what the top priority is. Anyway, I think other countries including Korea should do something to preserve Amazon and help Brazil anyhow.
답글삭제I agree with you, but i think that there is a reason why some people are willing to deforest amazon. It's because people are poor and hungry and they want land to settle so they can raise crops and support their family. Also, in part because people are greedy and it's a cheap place to raise cattle and other crops. So if we want to save amazon, we should provide some amount of financial aid to those people.
답글삭제Amazon gives us to enough natural resources to people. To destoy Amazon is ,in other words, that it attacks us. We seriously consider to develop Amazon whether it is good or not in our future
답글삭제